STROBOSCOPIC VISION TRAINING A HISTORIC PERSPECTIVE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of liquid crystal stroboscopic sports vision training dates back to our introduction in 1995. With vision being the predominant sensory modality driving a motor response—whether hitting a baseball, shooting a basketball, a goalie stopping an incoming puck hurtling towards him—coaches, sports psychologists, researchers, and sports vision doctors have worked to develop strategies to improve performance. What can be measured for the entire neuro-visual processing? Can you improve this processing? If so, what are the most effective regimens? How long does it last? What is it that the athlete visually discriminates on for meaning and expertise? Saccadic eye movements are the most common visual skill for acquiring a target. When making these eye movements, the brain ‘masks’ the visual world for a few milliseconds until the eye come to a stop. This is known as saccadic omission and suppression. Are there effective strategies to minimize the effect and speed up the saccadic eye movements? Can we improve fixation accuracy? Decrease latencies? Improve target acquisition, sometimes referred to as dynamic visual acuity? A body of research quickly uncovers what stroboscopic vision training (SVT) can and cannot impact. Both anecdotal and statistically significant research studies shed light on SVT enhancing central visual processing, visual concentration, and athletic performance tied to the subskills impacted by SVT.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Gawande A. Better A Surgeon’s Note on Performance. Picador, New York: 2008.
Leigh RJ; Zee DS (eds). The Neurology of Eye Movements. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia: 1991.
Ciuffreda KJ, Tannen B (eds). Eye Movement Basics for the Clinician. Mosby, New York: 1995. 4. Nakayama K. Motion Parallax Sensitivity and Space Perception. In Hein, A and Jeannerod, M (eds): Spatial Oriented Behavior. SpringerVerlag; New York: 1983.
Sicong Liu, Edmunds FR, Burris K, and Appelbaum LG. Visual and oculomotor abilities predict professional baseball batting performance, International J Perform Anal Sport 2020. https:/doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2020.1777819--
Desmurget M and Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul. Ed.) 2000;4:423–431.
Proteau L and Cournoyer J. Vision of the stylus in a manual aiming task: the effects of practice. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990;42:811–828.
Moreno FJ, Luis V, Salgado F, Garcia JA, Reina R. Visual behavior and perception of trajectories of moving objects with visual occlusion. Percept Mot Skills 2005;101(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.2466/ pms.101.5.13-20
Appelbaum LG, Schroeder JE, Cain MS, and Mitroff SR. Improved visual cognition through stroboscopic training. Frontiers Psychol 2011;2:276. https:/doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00276
Appelbaum LG, Schroeder JE, Cain MS, Darling EF, and Mitroff SR. Stroboscopic Visual Training improves information encoding in short-term memory. Atten Percept Psychophys 2012;74(8):1681–1691.
Clark JF, Ellis JK, Bench J, Khoury J, Graman P. High-Performance Vision Training Improves Batting Statistics for University of Cincinnati Baseball Players. PLoS ONE 2012;7(1):e29109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029109
Appelbaum LG, Lu Y, Khanna R, Detwiler KR. The effects of sports vision training on sensorimotor abilities in collegiate softball athletes. Athl Train Sports Health Care 2016;8(4):154–163.
Wilkins L and Appelbaum LG. An early review of stroboscopic visual training: insights, challenges and accomplishments to guide future studies, Internat Rev Sport Exercise Psychol 2020; 13(1):65–80. https:/doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2019.1582081
Ellison P, Jones C, Sparks SA, Murphy PN, Page RM, Carnegie E, Marchant DC. The effect of stroboscopic visual training on eye hand coordination. Sports Sci for Health 2020;16:401–410.